Phase2-hgx367 Try to create a scenario with T37, C27, N17, I22, F9

[bsunanda]

PR description:

Try to create a scenario with T37, C27, N17, I22, F9

PR validation:

Working with the new GEM geometry builder

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

To be seen if it is to be back ported> Debug is incomplete

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51080/49536

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_Run4.py modified in PR(s): Remove Run 1-3 and disable Phase 2 RelVal workflows that read existing non-RAW files #50954, [NGT] Add workflow to produce Phase2 NANOAOD with L1 and HLT objects #51004
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Rpc digi dev v9 #47447, update phase-2 HLT timing script and use alpaka modifier in NGT workflows #49821, [WIP] Prototype TruthInfo graph for truth history navigation and association studies #50913, [NGT] Add workflow to produce Phase2 NANOAOD with L1 and HLT objects #51004, Displaced Particle Gun #51006, add phase-2 HLT nano workflows to the nano matrix #51013

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

• code-format:
  https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51080/49536/code-format.patch
  e.g. curl -k https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51080/49536/code-format.patch | patch -p1
  You can also run scram build code-format to apply code format directly

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51080/49538

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_Run4.py modified in PR(s): Remove Run 1-3 and disable Phase 2 RelVal workflows that read existing non-RAW files #50954, [NGT] Add workflow to produce Phase2 NANOAOD with L1 and HLT objects #51004
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Rpc digi dev v9 #47447, update phase-2 HLT timing script and use alpaka modifier in NGT workflows #49821, [WIP] Prototype TruthInfo graph for truth history navigation and association studies #50913, [NGT] Add workflow to produce Phase2 NANOAOD with L1 and HLT objects #51004, Displaced Particle Gun #51006, add phase-2 HLT nano workflows to the nano matrix #51013

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Geometry (geometry)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• Geometry/CMSCommonData (geometry)
• Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder (geometry)

@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Dr15Jones, @antoniovagnerini, @bsunanda, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kfjack, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @miquork, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @elusian, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @giovanni-mocellin, @jshlee, @makortel, @martinamalberti, @mmasciov, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @sameasy, @slomeo, @vargasa, @watson-ij this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[kpedro88]

Please add the definition of D126 at the bottom of this README file

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[makortel]

(I assume this PR does not need a backport to 17_0_X (Run 3 legacy))

[cmsbuild]

Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_20_1_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_20_0_X.

[bsunanda]

Can this be merged urgently?

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[ftenchini]

+1