enable multi-vectorization for ucx version 1.20.1 - #10663
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar for branch IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/master. @akritkbehera, @cmsbuild, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
please test |
|
Pull request #10663 was updated. |
|
Thanks @smuzaffar . I have the impression looking at the code that the Anyway, let's look at the logs once the bot has completed the build. |
|
Pull request #10663 was updated. |
|
please test build with make verbose output enabled |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20c18c/54082/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@fwyzard , you are right. about [a] |
|
please test |
|
Pull request #10663 was updated. |
|
Hi @smuzaffar, thanks a lot. Thanks @fwyzard for the checks as well.
|
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20c18c/54100/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
Max Memory Comparisons exceeding threshold@cms-sw/core-l2 , I found 6 workflow step(s) with memory usage exceeding the error threshold: Expand to see workflows ...
|
|
Pull request #10663 was updated. |
|
Hi @smuzaffar and @fwyzard, I saw no performance difference comparing with/without
The size of the external in |
|
Everything else, I think we can leave it as it is in this PR. Thanks @smuzaffar for the changes you made. I checked that the basic UCX debug flags we typically use at runtime are still available with the changes this PR makes to the |
|
please test |
|
Pull request #10663 was updated. |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20c18c/54164/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+externals |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
Thank you @smuzaffar |

Follow up on #10658 , this PR fixes