Skip to content

ci: Add registry-based v1.8.6 vs v2.0.1 benchmark comparison workflow - #575

Open
sator-imaging wants to merge 7 commits into
yuin:v2from
sator-imaging:v2
Open

ci: Add registry-based v1.8.6 vs v2.0.1 benchmark comparison workflow#575
sator-imaging wants to merge 7 commits into
yuin:v2from
sator-imaging:v2

Conversation

@sator-imaging

@sator-imaging sator-imaging commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR adds another v1/v2 performance comparison and GH Action to see the result in the web browser.

sample: https://github.com/sator-imaging/yuin--goldmark/actions/runs/33727671305

* feat: add benchmark comparison scaffolding

Co-authored-by: sator-imaging <16752340+sator-imaging@users.noreply.github.com>

* chore: add benchmark module lockfiles

Co-authored-by: sator-imaging <16752340+sator-imaging@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: set minimal github token permissions for benchmark workflow

Co-authored-by: sator-imaging <16752340+sator-imaging@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci

* ci 2

* ci 3

* ci 4

* ci 5

* ci 6

* ci 7

* ci 8

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sator-imaging <16752340+sator-imaging@users.noreply.github.com>
@sator-imaging sator-imaging changed the title ci: Add registry-based v1.8.5 vs v2.0.0 benchmark comparison workflow (#1) ci: Add registry-based v1.8.5 vs v2.0.0 benchmark comparison workflow Aug 27, 2026
@ossenthusiast

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Slop

* add stats

* fix

* upd

* done

* done 2
* feat: table

* lol
* add allocs columns

* fix
@sator-imaging sator-imaging changed the title ci: Add registry-based v1.8.5 vs v2.0.0 benchmark comparison workflow ci: Add registry-based v1.8.6 vs v2.0.1 benchmark comparison workflow Sep 3, 2026
* chore: clarify what actually happening

* stderr?

* done
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants