MPI-AMRVAC support for uniformly stretched grids - #5474
Conversation
|
Hey Jordi, thanks for opening this. My week is a bit bumpy but I'm hoping I can slip in a review in the coming days. Don't hesitate to remind me if I don't make it by next Monday. |
|
ok so I take it we can close #5212 now ? |
|
Yes, we don't need #5212 anymore |
|
Reading |
neutrinoceros
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this seems on the right track. Here are a couple, mostly stylistic suggestions to make it easier to statically check
| * Only uniform stretching is supported at the moment, to be defined | ||
| as ``'uni'`` or ``'uniform'``. | ||
| * At present, stretched grids are only supported on a | ||
| single level of refinement. |
|
Should I add a test? If so, can you point me in the right direction on how to set that up? |
|
A test would indeed help. The process is a bit involved though, and I'm not even sure we can still do it as the server we used to run integration tests against real data died a couple months back... I'll ask around. |
|
The answer I got is that the dataset sample collection is still up and can be extended, so we should be able to add a test ! |

PR Summary
Redefines the AMRVACGrid as a subclass of StretchedGrid and calculates the cell widths' deviation from uniform.
PR Checklist