-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
feat(persistence): wire execution event writers (stage 3.2) #2145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rogercloud
wants to merge
4
commits into
xorbitsai:main
Choose a base branch
from
rogercloud:feat/conversation-event-writers
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9795493
feat(persistence): wire versioned execution event writers
4fcd5a3
fix(migrations): handle absent tasks during event writer downgrade
041025c
test: isolate legacy delegated agent trace selection
5ac2910
fix(ci): align web tests with execution event writers
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[P1] Use this attempt identity for control-tool outbound messages
These IDs protect normal tool execution, but the
send_messageandask_user_questioncontrol paths never pass them toruntime.send_message(). After theafter_llmcheckpoint has stored this pending call, the outbound transaction can commit and the process can exit before the following checkpoint removes the call. Recovery then executes the same control call again, generates a new outbound UUID, and sends/persists the same message twice.I reproduced the persistence side directly: replaying the same outbound
event_idproduces one deduplicated outbound fact but twoassistant_messagefacts and two chat rows, becausestage_chat_message_no_commit()assigns a random identity to non-terminal assistant messages. Please propagatetool_attempt_id/assistant_message_idthrough the control-message path and use a stable identity for both the outbound fact and chat projection, or route control tools through the same attempt start/end protocol.