Add downstream test for TrixiTest.jl

[JoshuaLampert]

Since #76 accidentally broke TrixiTest.jl (and therefore other downstream packages), I thought it might be a good idea to run downstream tests here to catch errors like this earlier and avoid releasing version that break tests. We could also run downstream tests for Trixi.jl, but I think with the tests of TrixiTest.jl we should usually catch most issues and the tests of Trixi.jl would take much longer.

[ranocha]

Thanks!

[JoshuaLampert]

As I wrote in trixi-framework/TrixiTest.jl#38 (comment), it is unfortunately not quite true that succeeding tests in TrixiTest.jl can give us confidence that the tests in Trixi.jl do not fail because of changes in TrixiBase.jl/TrixiTest.jl. So should we add more downstream tests here? Either a representative part of Trixi.jl's tests (tree_part1 and misc_part1 failed due to the recent TrixiBase.jl update) or the upstream tests of TrixiShallowWater.jl (also failed), or another repo?

[ranocha]

Can we add tests to TrixiTest.jl that would fail in the same way as tests in Trixi.jl failed with the new version of TrixiBase.jl?

[JoshuaLampert]

Good idea. I'll look into it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.56%. Comparing base (c01f1c4) to head (3591e5c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #77   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.56%   94.56%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         313      313           
=======================================
  Hits          296      296           
  Misses         17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coveralls]

Coverage Report for CI Build 32878883622

Coverage remained the same at 94.569%

Details

• Coverage remained the same as the base build.
• Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
• 48 coverage regressions across 3 files.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

48 previously-covered lines in 3 files lost coverage.

File	Lines Losing Coverage	Coverage
test/trixi_include.jl	44	77.08%
src/TrixiBase.jl	3	0.0%
src/trixi_timeit.jl	1	83.33%

---

Coverage Stats

Relevant Lines:	313
Covered Lines:	296
Line Coverage:	94.57%
Coverage Strength:	115.65 hits per line

---

💛 - Coveralls