org: add pujitha24 to the tektoncd org - #1295
Conversation
Requesting Tekton org membership under the contributor ladder's "Authored or Reviewed 5 PRs" path. Signed-off-by: Pujitha Paladugu <10557236+pujitha24@users.noreply.github.com> Assisted-by: claude-sonnet-5 (via Claude Code)
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
hello, thank you, it would be nice if you can come over to our weekly meeting to discuss this. |
|
Sounds good, happy to join and talk it through. I see working-groups.md lists a Governing Board / Community sync for community operations/process — is that the one you mean, or a different meeting? Point me to the right one (and time) and I'll show up. |
Requesting membership of the tektoncd GitHub organization.
Eligibility
Per contributor-ladder.md, an Organization Member needs one of "Authored or Reviewed 5 PRs" or endorsement by 2 existing Org Members. I'm applying under the authored path:
pipeline,operator,triggers,chains,pipelines-as-code,results— of which 10 are merged.tekton-devmailing list.@chmouel separately indicated he was happy for me to submit (pipelines-as-code#2916). Noting it as context rather than as the qualifying route, since the authored path doesn't require endorsers.
Why it would help
Several of my open PRs sit red purely because the
Check user permissions on PRsstep (pipelines-as-code/ok-to-test@v1, gated on team membership) fails for non-members, so e2e never runs regardless of/ok-to-testcomments — which is the friction org/README.md describes membership as resolving.AI disclosure
Per Tekton's AI contribution policy: my contributions are AI-assisted and disclosed with
Assisted-by:trailers. Happy to answer questions on any specific PR in the record.