Skip to content

contract: history resolutions come from the power history - #1856

Merged
frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
contract-history-power-source
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

frahlg merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
contract-history-power-source

Conversation

@frahlg

@frahlg frahlg commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

#1854 (merged) serves the app's history tiles for grid, PV and battery from the measured power rows that /api/history draws, at 5m and 1h alike. Load stays the energy ledger's consumer use. The registry still said source: energy_ledger for 5m and source: hourly_rollup for 1h.

What changes

resolutions in registry.yaml: source: power_history for both. No geometry changes: same tile spans, same retention. The generated go/protocol/contract_gen.go comment follows (ResN5m and ResN1h "come from the power_history").

Paired with srcfl/ftw-webapp, where the registry is edited, and srcfl/ftw-app. Merge the three together.

Contract-pair: srcfl/ftw-webapp@fe1db8c

Checks

  • go generate in go/internal/appproto and go test ./internal/appproto/... pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copy of srcfl/ftw-webapp's registry change, with contract_gen.go
regenerated. #1854 serves grid, PV and battery tiles from the measured
power rows at 5m and 1h alike; load stays the ledger's consumer use.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-25T16:45:27.152787Z 898c707 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@frahlg frahlg added the no-changeset PR intentionally exempt from the changeset requirement (dev tooling / non-shipping) label Oct 25, 2026
@frahlg
frahlg merged commit 67d65c6 into master Oct 25, 2026
22 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-changeset PR intentionally exempt from the changeset requirement (dev tooling / non-shipping)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant