Skip to content

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

13 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

EvalEval Technical Audit

This repository contains a frozen, claim-scoped technical audit of EvalEval's Evaluation Cards pipeline and related public artifacts.

The audit does not assign EvalEval a project-wide PASS or FAIL grade. Every verdict belongs to a preregistered test claim at a stated measurement granularity.

Current status

  • Frozen object date: 2026-08-19
  • Completed confirmatory tests: 17
  • Final canonical verdicts: 12 CONFIRMED / 5 REFUTED / 0 INCONCLUSIVE / 0 ERROR
  • Canonical machine-readable test map: TEST_INDEX.json
  • Claim-to-verdict traceability: CLAIM_INDEX.json
  • Current scope and strongest supported findings: AUDIT_STATUS.md
  • Review instructions: REVIEW_GUIDE.md

CONFIRMED and REFUTED are claim-level outcomes. They are not project-level endorsements or grades.

Strongest supported finding

The strongest completed branch concerns EvalEval's comparability grouping for one WildBench/OpenEval production group.

The completed chain shows that:

  1. the production group collapses four exact source metric identities into one fallback production identity;
  2. preserving exact source metric identity makes all four applicable WildBench source-id subgroups negative for variant divergence;
  3. the frozen structured source representation exposes multiple units and scale signatures and no explicit structured common-scale transform under the preregistered eligibility rule; and
  4. Stage F constructs a field-wise group MetricConfig that matches zero exact source metric configurations while exactly reproducing the production threshold of 0.5.

The supported conclusion is operational and provenance-scoped. The audit does not claim that all four channels necessarily measure different latent constructs, that exact source-id preservation is the only valid repair, or that EvalEval comparability is generally invalid.

Observed product-level magnitude

The affected mixed-unit branch changes the frozen headline variant-divergence count from 343 to 341 under the preregistered two-group counterfactual (T09). The absolute aggregate effect in this snapshot is therefore small: -2 groups, or about -0.232 percentage points among variant-eligible groups.

That small aggregate magnitude does not erase the correctness/provenance finding for the specific claim-governing WildBench group, but it constrains how broadly the result should be described.

Other important result

T01 and T02 confirm controlled exact-boundary binary floating-point sensitivity in comparability arithmetic. T03 then scans the full frozen Stage F population and finds zero real-corpus classification flips from that particular boundary mechanism. The controlled defect therefore must not be presented as a frozen-corpus impact finding.

Frozen object

The audit pinned the following repositories:

  • evaleval/eval_cards_backend_pipeline — 9c16ab3f93a4ba02a5b44590858bbdf824ed09d3
  • evaleval/eval-card-registry — 6fb026d7483467f063da465c15a76733b3d25f4c
  • evaleval/every_eval_ever — 9bce4136e789ec006c62582f5f9d107d20f8b398

The original full freeze verified 68,126 files with bad=0 and missing=0. See freeze/VERIFY_FREEZE.txt and freeze/SHA256SUMS.txt.

The compact public repository does not include the full multi-gigabyte frozen corpus. It includes the compact evidence artifacts needed to inspect the completed claims plus freeze hashes/metadata. See REPRODUCTION.md.

How to review

Start here:

  1. AUDIT_STATUS.md
  2. CLAIM_INDEX.json
  3. TEST_INDEX.json
  4. the relevant test's PREREGISTRATION.md
  5. its canonical results/summary.json
  6. its results/RESULT_ANALYSIS.md

For a mechanical integrity check of this compact publication bundle, run:

python tools/verify_public_bundle.py

Each test also contains verify_prereg.py. Those scripts verify the immutability/hash integrity of preregistered test artifacts; they do not independently recompute the scientific verdict.

T14 harness-repair history

T14 preserves the full technical repair sequence:

ERROR -> INCONCLUSIVE -> INCONCLUSIVE -> INCONCLUSIVE -> CONFIRMED

The accepted result is HARNESS_FIX_04; canonical results/summary.json is byte-identical to summary_fix4.json. Earlier attempts remain as provenance and are not competing final verdicts.

Method provenance

Test selection and construction used two methodological sources:

  • the Falsification Protocol, used as a dependency/decision procedure rather than as a literal test checklist;
  • a working internal Validation Handbook used during construction of some tests.

The Validation Handbook is not published in this repository and is not presented as a validated general methodology. Audit conclusions are supported by the frozen artifacts, preregistered test definitions, and observed outputs of the completed tests, rather than by the Handbook's authority.

Test-level method provenance is recorded in each TEST_RATIONALE.md and SOURCE_ATTRIBUTION.md.

Historical files

Some root and method artifacts intentionally preserve earlier audit stages. In particular, PREREGISTRATION.md is the original freeze-only initial preregistration, and method/COMPLETED_TESTS_RATIONALE.md is a historical snapshot that stops before later tests. They are evidence of chronology, not current status documents.

The original freeze-stage README is preserved at history/README_FREEZE_STAGE.md.

Publication notes

Some raw JSON captures preserve absolute local Windows paths from the execution environment. They are retained unchanged because they are provenance-bearing raw artifacts and are covered by existing hashes/manifests. They are not credentials. The two local terminal transcripts that contained local-path/Cyrillic output were excluded from the compact public bundle and are listed in PUBLIC_REVIEW_MANIFEST.json.

No scientific preregistration, raw result, canonical result, or post-run test analysis was rewritten for this publication wrapper.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages