Skip to content

Rename Internal Functions - #668

Merged
sadrasabouri merged 7 commits into
devfrom
rename-internal-functions
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

Rename Internal Functions#668
sadrasabouri merged 7 commits into
devfrom
rename-internal-functions

Conversation

@sepandhaghighi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Reference Issues/PRs

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

  • Internal functions renamed

Any other comments?

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.38%. Comparing base (5486486) to head (717c11c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #668   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.38%   99.38%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        3384     3384           
  Branches      460      460           
=======================================
  Hits         3363     3363           
  Misses         15       15           
  Partials        6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sepandhaghighi
sepandhaghighi marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 08:51

@sadrasabouri sadrasabouri left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@sadrasabouri
sadrasabouri merged commit b7a480c into dev Aug 10, 2026
37 of 51 checks passed
@sadrasabouri
sadrasabouri deleted the rename-internal-functions branch August 10, 2026 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants