Refine description of "About" and mention transparency. - #19716
Conversation
b7ed70a to
25c7423
Compare
25c7423 to
0b738e9
Compare
|
cc @herbelin |
|
@coq/doc-maintainers Would someone review? |
|
Regarding the transparency message, I think it is ok as the PR does (this will be adapted anyway in #19029) Regarding the "expansion weight" lines, which I don't know how it works, I have no idea whether the change is worth or not. |
Does this help?
|
herbelin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added a few other things made by About. Still not exhaustive though. For instance, it also mentions the dependencies in section variables.
Then fine to me. |
0b738e9 to
8b4af72
Compare
|
Added your changes. Should be ready to merge. Thanks! |
|
OK, will merge by tomorrow or Wednesday if there are no more comments. |
|
@coqbot run full ci |
1 similar comment
|
@coqbot run full ci |
Please? |
|
@coqbot merge now |
|
Let's not backport a change in output (there is still a little risk that someone relies on it). |

I also edited the text describing the transparency states to make them match the description in the
Strategycommand. Let me know if I guessed wrong.