Repository navigation
docs: add contribution guidelines and pull request template - #462
Conversation
Deploying drawnix with
|
| Latest commit: |
5669329
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://f9c01b07.drawnix.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://nightt5879-community-contrib.drawnix.pages.dev |
|
I accidentally clicked “Request Copilot review.” Please ignore it and any follow-up actions or comments it may generate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds baseline community contribution documentation and a PR template to standardize expectations for development checks, PR content, and AI disclosure across the Drawnix repository.
Changes:
- Add
CONTRIBUTING.mddescribing community language, local dev checks, PR expectations, and AI-assisted contribution requirements. - Add
.github/pull_request_template.mdto capture summary, validation evidence, and AI disclosure consistently.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Introduces contributor workflow guidance (language, local dev checks, PR expectations, AI disclosure). |
| .github/pull_request_template.md | Adds a PR template to standardize validation evidence and AI-assistance disclosure. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
pubuzhixing8
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the contribution! This looks good overall. Approved. As a non-blocking follow-up, please consider adding a link to CONTRIBUTING.md in both README.md and README_en.md so contributors can discover the guide more easily.
|
Thanks! I’ve added the |
|
LGTM! |
Summary
Related Issue
None.
Validation
Evidence, screenshots, or compatibility notes:
npm run lintpassed locally.npm run testpassed locally: 4 projects and 29 tests.npm run buildpassed locally: 4 projects.npm run format:checkreported existing Windows workspace formatting differences across 128 files; neither added Markdown file was reported. The same check passed in Linux CI.mainCI job passed, including lint, format check, affected tests/builds, and E2E.AI Assistance
Did you use AI tools to generate or substantially modify code, tests, or documentation in this pull request?
If yes:
Tool/model: Codex / GPT-5.6 Sol
AI-assisted work: I used Codex to review the current repository workflow and settings and to draft and refine
CONTRIBUTING.mdand the pull request template based on my requirements.My review and validation: I reviewed the complete contents of both documents, confirmed the policy and scope, and approved the final drafts. I also reviewed the repository commands and settings and the reported results from the local lint, tests, and builds.
I reviewed and understand the AI-assisted changes and can explain and maintain them
Checklist