feat: allow selection of platforms to build the custom flavor on - #6950
Merged
Conversation
bdovaz
requested review from
Kurt-von-Laven,
echoix and
nvuillam
as code owners
January 11, 2026 19:44
Contributor
✅
|
Member
|
@bdovaz if it doesnt change the default behavior, all good for me 😃 |
echoix
approved these changes
Jan 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

When merged, #2273 will allow someone to create a custom flavor for
linux/arm64.There are very few linters that cannot build
linux/arm64, and the documentation (all_linters.md) lists which ones are compatible and which ones are not.With this PR, I make it possible for a user to build for
linux/arm64in addition to building forlinux/amd64.This way, we do not block users from this functionality even though we do not yet generate images for
linux/arm64in our workflows.This functionality should be considered “beta” since we are not yet validating or publishing images for this platform in our workflows so we are unable to detect regressions.
cc @nvuillam @echoix