Use docker/build-push-action@ in CI instead of upload-docker.sh - #2342
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
🦙 MegaLinter status:
|
| Descriptor | Linter | Files | Fixed | Errors | Elapsed time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ BASH | bash-exec | 6 | 0 | 0.04s | |
| ✅ BASH | shellcheck | 6 | 0 | 0.2s | |
| ✅ BASH | shfmt | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.43s |
| ✅ COPYPASTE | jscpd | yes | no | 3.96s | |
| ✅ DOCKERFILE | hadolint | 105 | 0 | 12.38s | |
| ✅ JSON | eslint-plugin-jsonc | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2.82s |
| ✅ JSON | jsonlint | 19 | 0 | 0.4s | |
| ✅ JSON | v8r | 21 | 0 | 15.23s | |
| markdownlint | 309 | 0 | 232 | 7.76s | |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdown-link-check | 309 | 0 | 6.23s | |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdown-table-formatter | 309 | 0 | 0 | 21.12s |
| ✅ OPENAPI | spectral | 1 | 0 | 2.37s | |
| bandit | 176 | 45 | 2.51s | ||
| ✅ PYTHON | black | 176 | 0 | 0 | 4.96s |
| ✅ PYTHON | flake8 | 176 | 0 | 2.4s | |
| ✅ PYTHON | isort | 176 | 0 | 0 | 0.97s |
| ✅ PYTHON | mypy | 176 | 0 | 10.22s | |
| ✅ PYTHON | pylint | 176 | 0 | 14.7s | |
| pyright | 176 | 276 | 22.74s | ||
| ✅ REPOSITORY | checkov | yes | no | 36.76s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | git_diff | yes | no | 0.43s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | secretlint | yes | no | 15.36s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | trivy | yes | no | 31.58s | |
| ✅ SPELL | cspell | 729 | 0 | 27.09s | |
| ✅ SPELL | misspell | 550 | 0 | 0 | 1.0s |
| ✅ XML | xmllint | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.47s |
| ✅ YAML | prettier | 81 | 0 | 0 | 3.79s |
| ✅ YAML | v8r | 23 | 0 | 73.64s | |
| ✅ YAML | yamllint | 82 | 0 | 1.39s |
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
nvuillam
force-pushed
the
features/docker-build-action
branch
from
February 11, 2023 00:25
1270e27 to
39fea0b
Compare
nvuillam
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 11, 2023 02:12
Member
Author
🦙 MegaLinter status:
|
| Descriptor | Linter | Files | Fixed | Errors | Elapsed time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ BASH | bash-exec | 6 | 0 | 0.01s | |
| ✅ BASH | shellcheck | 6 | 0 | 0.16s | |
| ✅ BASH | shfmt | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.04s |
| ✅ COPYPASTE | jscpd | yes | no | 2.78s | |
| ✅ DOCKERFILE | hadolint | 105 | 0 | 7.19s | |
| ✅ JSON | eslint-plugin-jsonc | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1.66s |
| ✅ JSON | jsonlint | 19 | 0 | 0.25s | |
| ✅ JSON | npm-package-json-lint | yes | no | 0.59s | |
| ✅ JSON | v8r | 21 | 0 | 12.71s | |
| markdownlint | 309 | 2 | 232 | 5.8s | |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdown-link-check | 309 | 0 | 5.25s | |
| ✅ MARKDOWN | markdown-table-formatter | 309 | 2 | 0 | 14.67s |
| ✅ OPENAPI | spectral | 1 | 0 | 1.6s | |
| bandit | 176 | 45 | 2.03s | ||
| ✅ PYTHON | black | 176 | 0 | 0 | 3.19s |
| ✅ PYTHON | flake8 | 176 | 0 | 1.76s | |
| ✅ PYTHON | isort | 176 | 0 | 0 | 0.53s |
| ✅ PYTHON | mypy | 176 | 0 | 6.62s | |
| ✅ PYTHON | pylint | 176 | 0 | 10.36s | |
| pyright | 176 | 274 | 15.44s | ||
| ✅ REPOSITORY | checkov | yes | no | 26.23s | |
| devskim | yes | 61 | 1.25s | ||
| ✅ REPOSITORY | dustilock | yes | no | 3.47s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | git_diff | yes | no | 0.05s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | secretlint | yes | no | 6.49s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | syft | yes | no | 0.87s | |
| ✅ REPOSITORY | trivy | yes | no | 15.91s | |
| ✅ SPELL | cspell | 729 | 0 | 16.54s | |
| ✅ SPELL | misspell | 550 | 2 | 0 | 0.51s |
| ✅ XML | xmllint | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.03s |
| ✅ YAML | prettier | 81 | 0 | 0 | 2.49s |
| ✅ YAML | v8r | 23 | 0 | 51.9s | |
| ✅ YAML | yamllint | 82 | 0 | 1.14s |
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
You could have same capabilities but better runtime performances if you request a new MegaLinter flavor.
Member
Author
|
@bdovaz I knew you would like it haha ^^ And it will be a game changer for releases.... until now we always rebuilt the images, so there was 1h between the release (with dependabot & renovate creating automated PRs in repos using MegaLinter), and that provoked issues because the new images were not released yet... Now we'll just take beta images, retag them & push them, and it is done in 2 mn ^^ |
Collaborator
|
@nvuillam yes, little by little we are getting rid of the technical debt inherited from superlinter in terms of CI and that's really great! |
4 tasks
This was referenced Aug 31, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.