Repository navigation
fix(ui-egui): release quality sweep #1603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
425eb4d
fix(ui-egui): read theme files more faithfully
giswqs 44b094d
fix(ui-egui): clearer and translated messages
giswqs ae60b00
fix(ui-egui): Shift-click finds a moved label, model checked first
giswqs 6bb0b77
chore: keep the I/O error source, reuse civil, fix an NSIS comment
giswqs 7e4ba53
fix(ui-egui): keep finite-only theme sizes, one full stop in plugin n…
giswqs 6bb581a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into sweep/ui
giswqs c8c0ebd
Address review feedback
giswqs File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug (confidence: medium), re-raised with new detail. The
instancecheck runs only whenlayeris given. Withlayeromitted, this arm returns the active layer and never looks atinstance, so{"instance": "7"}or{"instance": 1.5}silently exports the active layer. The PR body says malformed export arguments are now reported instead of treated as absent, and this path still breaks that. The new test coverslayer: trueandinstance: "7"only with alayerpresent, so it misses this case.A minimal fix for the malformed-type case, which is the part this PR is about:
A stale but well-typed
instancewith nolayer(the case the earlier thread raised) is still not checked against the active layer. Adding a no-layercase to the test would cover both.