Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
176 changes: 176 additions & 0 deletions docs/backend-support-probe-api-plan.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
<!--
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
Licensed under the MIT License.
-->

# Backend Support Probe API - Design & Discussion

> **Status:** Design Proposal

## 1. Purpose

Provide a read-only Rust API that reports **which containment backends the
current host can actually run**. Callers can read at startup
to choose a backend without attempting an execution. For the Windows
process-container backend it also reports the **effective isolation tier** the
host supports.
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated



```rust
// One host-available backend, plus its effective isolation tier (if any).
pub struct AvailableBackend {
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
/// Canonical wire name, e.g. "processcontainer", "seatbelt".
pub backend: String,
/// The highest-isolation tier the host supports for this backend, if the
/// backend has a tier ladder. `None` for backends with no tiers. The string
/// values are the canonical `IsolationTier::as_str()` names (not free-form),
/// and the field is omitted from JSON when `None`.
#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]
pub tier: Option<String>,
}

/// Probe the host and return only the backends it can currently run.
/// An empty `Vec` means "no backend this API can currently affirm on this host"
/// (e.g. an unsupported platform, Linux without `bwrap`, or macOS without
/// `sandbox-exec`) — it is a normal result, not an error.
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
pub fn available_backends() -> Vec<AvailableBackend>;
```

Example results:
| Host | Result |
| --- | --- |
| Stock Windows | `[{ backend: "processcontainer", tier: Some("appcontainer-dacl") }]` |
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
| Windows w/ BaseContainer | `[{ backend: "processcontainer", tier: Some("base-container") }]` |
| macOS | `[{ backend: "seatbelt", tier: None }]` |
| Linux w/ bwrap + lxc | `[{ backend: "bubblewrap", tier: None }, { backend: "lxc", tier: None }]` |
## 2. Guiding principle
This API answers **"what can I use here?"**, not **"what is the full capability
matrix of this machine?"**.
- We return **only** host-available backends. Nothing is reported as `false`.
- A backend's **absence** means "not currently usable, **for any reason**"
- For per-backend **diagnostics and reasons**, the tool is `wxc-exec --probe`
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
## 3. Detection & isolation tiers

### 3.1 Detection methods used today (and their risks)

Four backends already have *some* presence check, but they are spread across two
layers and vary in how much they actually prove. Documenting them here so the
probe API can reuse the Rust ones and knowingly accept the risk of the shallower
ones.
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.

| Backend | How presence is detected today | Where | Risk with this method |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `base-container` (process-container tier) | `fallback_detector::is_base_container_usable()` loads `processmodel.dll` and calls an OS capability/create API — no process or VM launch; result cached in a `OnceLock`. | Rust | A cached result (`true` **or** `false`) can go stale if BaseContainer enablement changes mid-process, and the probe is not perfectly pure since it loads a DLL. |
| `windows_sandbox` | `isWindowsSandboxAvailable()` runs `dism /online /get-featureinfo /featurename:Containers-DisposableClientVM` and looks for `State : Enabled`; if DISM throws (usually non-elevated) it falls back to `fs.existsSync(%SystemRoot%\System32\WindowsSandbox.exe)`; result cached. | TypeScript SDK | `dism /online` needs elevation, so a non-elevated caller can't tell *disabled* from *no permission* and drops to the exe-existence check — which proves the feature is installed, not that a sandbox VM can boot. Rust callers get nothing. |
| `lxc` | `isLxcAvailable()` runs `lxc-ls --version`; a clean exit means available. | TypeScript SDK | Only proves the `lxc-ls` CLI is on `PATH` — not that liblxc is loadable or that the caller has the namespaces/cgroup/privileges to actually start a container, so it can report available on a host where a real run fails. Rust callers get nothing. |
| `wslc` | `WslcSdk::load()` loads `wslcsdk.dll` from the executable's own directory (anti-hijack) and validates that every required export resolves. | Rust (execute path) | Runs on the *execute* path, not as a cheap standalone probe: it actually loads the DLL and resolves symbols. Proves the SDK runtime loads, not that a WSL distro/runtime is functional. Feature-gated. |

### 3.2 Isolation tiers (process-container only)

Only the Windows process-container backend has a within-backend tier ladder. The
three tiers, and the **policy-free** checks that decide whether each is
reachable, already exist in `appcontainer_common`:

| Tier | Reachable when | Detector |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `base-container` | BaseContainer API is **usable** (not merely symbol-present) | `fallback_detector::is_base_container_usable()` (the cached wrapper) |
| `appcontainer-bfs` | built with the `tier2_bfs` feature | `cfg!(feature = "tier2_bfs")` |
| `appcontainer-dacl` | always (universal Windows floor) | — |



## 4. The probe gap today
Four backends have no *probe-suitable* (cheap, no persistent host mutation, no
process/VM launch) host detector in Rust today, so a truthful availability signal
for them **cannot be built just yet**. (`lxc` and `wslc` are handled separately —
their checks are documented in §3.1 and accepted as good enough.)

| Backend | What a real probe needs | What exists today | Risk if faked |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `windows_sandbox` | DISM/registry check of the *Containers-DisposableClientVM* optional feature | only a private "is the `.exe` on disk" check | reports available when the feature is off → launch fails |
| `isolation_session` | build ≥ 26300.8553 **and** `IsoSessionApp.dll` resolvable **and** feature compiled | build gate lives **only in the TypeScript SDK** | wrong OS builds falsely pass |

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adpa-ms will sessions have an API we can call with our new probe? Just to see if it's available I mean. Possibly could be an Is-Apiset-Available call, assuming they apis are in an apiset that is.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I improved the probe in #761 where it now looks for the API class being registered on the OS instead of checking a build number.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

adpa-ms following up: could sessions expose an apiset-available style check (for example IsApiSetImplemented against the IsolationSession apiset) so the probe can confirm availability cheaply without attempting a real activation? Now that #761 detects the Windows.AI.IsolationSession.Preview IsoSessionOps class registration rather than a build number, a lightweight availability query would shape the isolation_session detector nicely.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This API isn't in an apiset unfortunately. I do not think I can do better than I have put in right now. However, I'm noting this down as a follow up. The isolation session API is also attempting to lift out of the OS, so that may open up some better options down line.

| `microvm` | hypervisor (WHP) present | nothing | a naive check could **boot a VM** just to test |
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
| `hyperlight` | hypervisor present + feature compiled | nothing | same VM-boot risk |




## 5. Testing
- Every returned `backend` is a valid `wxc_common::wire::Containment` name.
- On Windows the result contains `processcontainer` with a `tier` of one of the three known strings;
`appcontainer-dacl` is the floor when nothing higher is reachable.
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
- On non-Windows, `processcontainer` never appears.
- On macOS, `seatbelt` appears with `tier: None` when `/usr/bin/sandbox-exec `exists.
- A serde snapshot pinning the camelCase JSON shape
(`{"backend":"…","tier":"…"}`), with `tier` **omitted** when `None`
(`#[serde(skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")]`) never serialized as `null`.
- Every non-`None` `tier` is one of the canonical `IsolationTier::as_str() `strings,
Comment thread
huzaifa-d marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
guarding against drift between this API and the tier ladder.
- On Linux, `bubblewrap` and `lxc` each appear when their check passes (`bwrap --version` / `lxc-ls --version`).
- `wslc` appears when `WslcSdk::load()` resolves `wslcsdk.dll`; the remaining VM group
(`windows_sandbox`, `isolation_session`, `microvm`, `hyperlight`) never appears until its
detector lands.

## 6. Follow-up work items

Writing the missing detectors, one issue per backend:
1. `windows_sandbox` - optional-feature (DISM/registry) detector.
2. `isolation_session` - port the build-number + `IsoSessionApp.dll` gate from TypeScript to Rust.
3. `microvm` / `hyperlight` - hypervisor-presence probe.
---

## 7. Appendix - Decisions & Notes

### 7.1 Separate from `platform_support()`

`platform_support()` (in `mxc_engine::platform`) answers a deliberately
narrower question: "Which backends can the `mxc-sdk` library actually launch?"
Its `available_methods` list is contractually the subset the SDK can drive. On
Linux it may only ever report `bubblewrap`, and unit tests lock that down.
`available_backends()` answers the broader host-capability question, so it is
a separate function.

### 7.2 Single `tier: Option<String>`

The fallback detector selects exactly **one** tier, so a per-tier availability
vector is overkill for a menu.

### 7.3 Effective tier is a ceiling, not a guarantee

The named tier is the strongest isolation the host is capable
of. A real request can still end up **lower**: some policy options force a
weaker tier (e.g. `deniedPaths` on a host without `SANDBOX_CAP_FS_DENY`
support, or `preferBaseContainer=false`).

### 7.4 Which tier gets named is based on precedence, not policy

A host can support several tiers at once. Rather than run your request to see
which one it would pick, the API just names the **strongest** tier the host can
do, by a fixed ranking. Because it never takes a request, it performs none of the
policy-dependent host permission checks that `fallback_detector::detect()` does
(and none of the later `DaclManager` ACE writes that real dispatch performs). It
is purely a reachability walk over the tier ladder.

### 7.5 The `base-container` tier uses `is_base_container_usable()`

This loads `processmodel.dll` and calls an OS capability/create API but it
never launches a process or VM to check.

### 7.6 `process` and `vm` are deliberately excluded

They are *abstract intents*, not backends with their own runner.

### 7.7 `base-container` detection caching

`fallback_detector::is_base_container_usable()` caches its result in a
`OnceLock`. So "fresh detection on every call" is not fully achievable for the
`base-container` tier, and a cached `true` can go **stale** if BaseContainer
enablement changes mid-process. Both are accepted and documented rather than
Comment on lines +196 to +201

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note: Richie added a check directly in base_container_runner now I believe that you can use.

worked around.

### 7.8 Ordering

Results are returned in a stable order, but callers
should **match by `backend` name, not by position**, so the order is free to
change without breaking anyone.
Loading