feat: add dockerfile for backend - #67
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Welcome @0PrashantYadav0! It looks like this is your first PR to kubeedge/dashboard 🎉 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @0PrashantYadav0, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've added a production-grade multi-stage Dockerfile for the API module, enabling containerized deployment of the backend. This change also includes comprehensive updates to the README.md to provide clear instructions for building and running both the API and Web modules using Docker, alongside existing local development guidelines.
Highlights
- API Dockerization: Introduced a new
Dockerfilefor the API module (modules/api/Dockerfile), creating a production-grade, multi-stage build. - Optimized Docker Image: The API Docker image is built as a static Go binary, uses a distroless non-root runtime for security and minimal size, exposes port 8080, and includes OCI labels for better image metadata.
- Updated Documentation: The
README.mdhas been significantly updated to include detailed instructions for building and running both the API and Web modules using Docker, complementing the existing local development setup. - Container Configuration: The API image build context is set to the repository root to leverage Go workspaces, and the default container command binds the API to
0.0.0.0:8080. - Web Proxying: The Web module is configured to proxy
/api/*to${API_SERVER}/api/v1/*and forward/keink/*, ensuring proper communication with the API container.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a production-grade, multi-stage Dockerfile for the API backend and updates the README with comprehensive instructions for building and running both the API and Web components using Docker. The changes are well-structured and follow good practices like using distroless, non-root images. My review includes suggestions to improve Docker layer caching for faster builds, a minor shell scripting improvement in the README, and a formatting fix for the Dockerfile.
Signed-off-by: JoyBoy <144602492+0PrashantYadav0@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: JoyBoy <144602492+0PrashantYadav0@users.noreply.github.com>
41d8740 to
557c0a7
Compare
|
@kevin-wangzefeng Please review and merge this PR. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Dockerfilefor the API module (BFF) atmodules/api/DockerfileREADME.mdwith clear Docker build/run instructions for both API and WebWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #65
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: