Move Cookbook Tests to Subdirectory

[danieldouglas92]

Move tests related to cookbooks into the cookbooks subdirectory.

• I followed the AI Policy:
  • Significant parts of this PR were written by AI (please add a sentence below).
  • AI has not been used in significant ways.

If yes, please describe your usage of AI models in the creation of this pull request
AI helped identify tests to move

[danieldouglas92]

Based on my comment in #7282 I've removed the bunge_cookbook from the cookbooks tests subdirectory for now.

Once this PR and #7282 I'll move more tests. I suspect that trying to do it all at once will end up with multiple conflicts where the same tests gets sorted into different subdirectories.

[gassmoeller]

I just wanted to comment that #7158 is almost ready to merge and will likely create conflicts with this PR. Since #7158 has been in preparation for a while and touches a lot more tests than this PR I would like to merge it first. Afterwards this needs to be rebased and conflicts resolved (it is just a single line in the tests .prms that is different).

[danieldouglas92]

/rebuild

[gassmoeller]

Thanks again for getting this started. Looks generally fine, except for the tests I marked. Maybe the refer to cookbooks and it is just not obvious from the name, in that case leave them in this PR. But if they are not, they should probably stay in the main directory.

[danieldouglas92]

@gassmoeller Thanks for looking thoroughly looking through this, I've looked at the .prm's for the tests that you asked about and they all include .prm's from cookbooks, which is definitely why they got sorted there initially. You bring up a good point though, an include statement doesn't mean that it is "testing" the cookbook.

This is clearly true for theinterface_weakening test, which is testing the new weakening mechanism that Ryan added at the hackathon (entirely unrelated to continental_extension) but it just so happens to use the continental_extension cookbook as a base. I'll take a closer look at the other ones and try to decide if they are actually testing the cookbook or not and move them accordingly.

[danieldouglas92]

After going through more thoroughly, there is seemingly no test for crustal_deformation_2D, finite_strain, free_surface, free_surface_with_crust, geomIO, lower_crustal_flow, platelike-boundary, plume_2D_chunk, prescribed_velocity_ascii_data, van-keken-vof, and all of the shell cookbooks (shell-simple 2D/3D, shell 2D smoothing and shell 3D postprocessing).

[gassmoeller]

Yes some cookbooks dont have tests, we only started asking for tests later. That is alright, we can add tests for them eventually. And it will be easier with this PR since now we have a list. Could you open an issue with the list of cookooks that dont have tests? Maybe we can use that in the tutorial of next years hackathon.

[danieldouglas92]

@gassmoeller I opened two issues, one for the missing cookbooks and another for the missing benchmarks! Once the tests pass I'll rebase and hopefully these will be good to go