-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
Add GASMAN workaround for fewer than 48-bits of addressable memory (riscv) #6522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
orlitzky
wants to merge
2
commits into
gap-system:master
Choose a base branch
from
orlitzky:sv39-mmu
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+47
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's on your 128 GB machine though, isn't it? But will it still work if run in e.g. a 16 GB machine, or a 256 GB machine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is only the offset within the virtual space and should not depend on the amount of physical RAM in the system. (I certainly don't have 16TB installed on the x86_64 box.)
I first tried 128GB (the halfway point in my VM space) but 96GB allowed me to extend the workspace much further. There is a trade-off between how much space to reserve for GASMAN vs. how much to leave for extensions to malloc. By choosing 96GB, I am limiting extensions to 96GB of usable RAM even though the machine has more available. But presently I find that less likely than the 100% chance that the images test suite wants to allocate 128GB.
The fact that this box has so much RAM on an SV39 MMU is an oddity. I don't know what the board designers were thinking, but the firmware is limited to 128GB, and I would guess that future boards (that can handle more physical RAM) will have more capable MMUs.