Skip to content

policy: add stale labeling action - #2919

Draft
veprbl wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pr/stale
Draft

policy: add stale labeling action#2919
veprbl wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
pr/stale

Conversation

@veprbl

@veprbl veprbl commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Briefly, what does this PR introduce? Please link to any relevant presentations or discussions.

Lightweight policy for marking issues/PRs with "stale" label and posting a message

What is the urgency of this PR?

  • High (please describe reason below)
  • Medium
  • Low

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix (issue #__)
  • New feature (issue #__)
  • Optimization (issue #__)
  • Updated parameters, constants (issue #__)
  • Updated documentation
  • other: __

Please check if any of the following apply

  • This PR requires changes to geometry (epic PR: __)
  • This PR requires changes to EDM4eic (EDM PR: __)
  • This PR introduces breaking changes. Please describe changes users need to make below.
  • This PR changes default behavior. Please describe changes below.
  • AI was used in preparing this PR. Please describe usage below.
    claude

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 28, 2026 17:27

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a GitHub Actions workflow policy to automatically label inactive issues and pull requests as stale (without auto-closing), to help maintain triage hygiene in the EICrecon repo.

Changes:

  • Introduces a scheduled + manually triggerable actions/stale@v9 workflow.
  • Applies stale label after 180 days of inactivity and posts a standard notification comment.
  • Explicitly grants minimal job-scoped permissions for issues/PR labeling and commenting.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@veprbl
veprbl marked this pull request as draft August 28, 2026 18:26
@wdconinc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can we get an action to post a message to the @eic/epic-review-team that says "this PR has been open for 6 months, and the submitter has kept on rebasing it and resolving conflicts; it would be really nice if someone gave it a review" ? ;-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants