Phase2-hgx367G Make a new scenario for Phase2 with latest versions of Tracker, HGCal, GE0 and MTD - #51241
Phase2-hgx367G Make a new scenario for Phase2 with latest versions of Tracker, HGCal, GE0 and MTD#51241bsunanda wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_20_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @Dr15Jones, @antoniovagnerini, @bsunanda, @civanch, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kfjack, @kpedro88, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @mdhildreth, @miquork, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+geometry |
|
@bsunanda @cms-sw/geometry-l2 I assume this scenario is supposed to be the new baseline for the Summer 2026 MC production, please use for MTD I21, i.e. the full 2 disks scenario, as MTD DPG has agreed with project managers. This will not be the final ETL, but the detailed final layout is still under discussion, and I22 most likely will NOT be that one. In case people wants to study the possible effect of acceptance reduction with I21, an approximate but effective way is to suppress reconstructed hits in the undesired region. Numbering scheme should remain valid though. |
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
Pull request #51241 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kfjack, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @sroychow can you please check and sign again. |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-runTheMatrix-interactive had ERRORS Failed RelVals |
|
@mmusich Commenting out those lines has caused failure. Shall I uncomment them? |
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals Failed Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-runTheMatrix-interactive had ERRORS Failed RelVals |
|
Pull request #51241 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @ftenchini, @kfjack, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @sroychow can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild Please test |
| numWFIB.extend([prefixDet+34.7503]) # HLTHeterogeneousValid | ||
| numWFIB.extend([prefixDet+34.751]) # HLTTiming75e33, alpaka | ||
| numWFIB.extend([prefixDet+34.7521]) # HLTTiming75e33, ticlv5TrackLinkingGNN | ||
| numWFIB.extend([prefixDet+34.7522]) # HLTTiming75e33, mtd_at_hlt |
|
Pull request has been put on hold by @mmusich |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
Max Memory Comparisons exceeding threshold@cms-sw/core-l2 , I found 1 workflow step(s) with memory usage exceeding the error threshold: Expand to see workflows ...
|
|
Use the PR#51531 instead |
PR description:
Make a new scenario in CMSSW_20_0_X for Phase2 with the latest versions of Tracker, HGCal, GE0 and MTD
PR validation:
Tested in CMSSW_20_1_X
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Nothing special