Skip to content

add hybrid PU workflow to PR tests - #51022

Merged
cmsbuild merged 3 commits into
cms-sw:masterfrom
kpedro88:Phase2-WF85
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

cmsbuild merged 3 commits into
cms-sw:masterfrom
kpedro88:Phase2-WF85

Conversation

@kpedro88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR description:

Now that the hybrid PU implementation is in the master branch (#50886), the workflow should be tested routinely. I have added one of the example workflows into the short matrix for PR tests.

I also dealt with these syntax warnings emitted by Python 3.12:

src/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/WorkFlowRunner.py:71: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'
  file_pattern_step = re.compile('file:step([1-9]+)(_[a-zA-Z]+)?\.[a-z]+')
src/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py:3889: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\)'
  'extend_file_name(process.ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiPixelAliHLTHGC.fileName.value(), \\"_0\\"\"\)',
src/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py:3910: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\)'
  'extend_file_name(process.ALCARECOStreamPromptCalibProdSiPixelAliHLTHGC.fileName.value(), \\"_1\\"\"\)',

(probably there should be a larger campaign to check for these; I only dealt with this one package)

attn: @civanch @subirsarkar @suchandradutta @bsunanda

PR validation:

runTheMatrix.py -l 17034.96 succeeds.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

N/A

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51022/49460

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv)

@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @kfjack, @miquork, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @fabiocos, @makortel, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@ftenchini, @mandrenguyen, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@kpedro88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 84KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-740f94/53446/summary.html
COMMIT: 336b5ba
CMSSW: CMSSW_17_0_X_2026-05-22-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/51022/53446/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 5 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 53
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 4198477
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 68
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 4198389
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 52 files compared)
  • Checked 227 log files, 197 edm output root files, 53 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@kpedro88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 please sign

@kpedro88

kpedro88 commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 please sign

@AdrianoDee

AdrianoDee commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kpedro88

kpedro88 commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@AdrianoDee there are quite a few entries missing from that table. I updated the 2025 section but did not go through the other years exhaustively.

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51022/49601

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull request #51022 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @kfjack, @miquork, @sroychow can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88

kpedro88 commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

please test

@AdrianoDee

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+pdmv

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-740f94/53626/summary.html
COMMIT: 90d062b
CMSSW: CMSSW_17_0_X_2026-06-01-1100/el8_amd64_gcc13
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/51022/53626/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mandrenguyen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
cmsbuild merged commit 102a2fe into cms-sw:master Jun 2, 2026
10 checks passed
NJManganelli pushed a commit to NJManganelli/cmssw that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2026
add hybrid PU workflow to PR tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants