add hybrid PU workflow to PR tests - #51022
Conversation
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51022/49460
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @kfjack, @miquork, @sroychow can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 84KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 please sign |
|
@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 please sign |
|
@kpedro88 can you add a line in the table in https://github.com/kpedro88/cmssw/blob/336b5ba390b3ecae734a60907fea2b4efe2e834f/Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/scripts/README.md? Thanks. |
|
@AdrianoDee there are quite a few entries missing from that table. I updated the 2025 section but did not go through the other years exhaustively. |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-51022/49601
|
|
Pull request #51022 was updated. @AdrianoDee, @DickyChant, @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @kfjack, @miquork, @sroychow can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @mandrenguyen, @ftenchini, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
+1 |
add hybrid PU workflow to PR tests
PR description:
Now that the hybrid PU implementation is in the master branch (#50886), the workflow should be tested routinely. I have added one of the example workflows into the short matrix for PR tests.
I also dealt with these syntax warnings emitted by Python 3.12:
(probably there should be a larger campaign to check for these; I only dealt with this one package)
attn: @civanch @subirsarkar @suchandradutta @bsunanda
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py -l 17034.96succeeds.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A