Drive build of rocm-system packages from a single build file. - #10714
Drive build of rocm-system packages from a single build file.#10714akritkbehera wants to merge 16 commits into
Conversation
|
please test |
|
A new Pull Request was created by @akritkbehera for branch IB/CMSSW_20_1_X/rocm724. @akritkbehera, @iarspider, @raoatifshad, @smuzaffar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
Random comment, just thinking out loud. Since most packages are built from the same sources, would it make sense to actually have a single spec file that builds multiple target |
With current multi-spec files ( one per rocm core/library package) we can build multiple packages in parallel . With one spec we will build one package at a time and can takes 8-10 to build build that package |
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f67d9b/54637/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
1a541eb to
16dfdbf
Compare
|
Pull request #10714 was updated. |
|
enable gpu |
|
please test |
|
@cmsbuild please abort |
|
please test |
|
Pull request #10714 was updated. |
Co-authored-by: Malik Shahzad Muzaffar <shahzad.malik.muzaffar@cern.ch>
|
Pull request #10714 was updated. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f67d9b/54845/summary.html Failed External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
|
please test |
|
-1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f67d9b/54852/summary.html Failed External BuildI found compilation warning when building: See details on the summary page. |
|
please test |
|
How's it the URL is working when I changed the the base branch but it wasn't previously? |
|
so amd renamed or deleted the branch |
|
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-AMD_W7900 amd_mi300xUnitTests Failed RelVals-AMD_W7900
Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_H100 Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_L40S Comparison SummarySummary:
NVIDIA_T4 Comparison SummarySummary:
Max Memory Comparisons exceeding threshold NVIDIA_T4@cms-sw/core-l2 , I found 1 workflow step(s) with memory usage exceeding the error threshold: Expand to see workflows ...
|
|
@fwyzard I have integrated TheRockRocm 7.14 without much changes from our existing ROCM 7.2.4. As you mentioned since there are changes to ROCM in TheRock you would like to run some test. I have setup an separate TheRock_ROCM IBs. They should be available soon! |
Thanks @akritkbehera ! |
modular rocm-systems