fix(docs): adopt the A-H rubric canon and disambiguate oferta from ofertas - #31
Open
santifer wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(docs): adopt the A-H rubric canon and disambiguate oferta from ofertas#31santifer wants to merge 1 commit into
santifer wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This was referenced Aug 11, 2026
…ertas
search-ops fixed the canon on 2026-08-11 after 18 days without objection: the
report is eight blocks, A through H, with H conditional. This is the group-2
sweep measured on 2026-07-30, executed in one pass.
Verified against the core before writing (modes/oferta.md, commit 350ab739):
eight `## X)` headings, and `## H) Draft Application Answers` gated on
"only if score >= 4.5". The site was carrying three different answers at once
— A-F, A-G and "seven-block" — depending on which file you opened.
17 files. Descriptions and prose in modes/{index,oferta,auto-pipeline} across
EN/ES/FR; the Block bullet list in docs/index across EN/ES/FR, which was
missing H entirely; schema.ts (`Block A-G evaluation` and "seven-section");
llms.txt, llms-full.txt and comparisons.json. translationHash re-stamped on
all eight touched translations.
Also lands the disambiguation search-ops asked for, in the passages engines
quote (methodology and llms-full):
oferta (singular) — ONE listing, five-dimension holistic rubric, no formula
ofertas (plural) — MULTIPLE offers, ten-dimension WEIGHTED matrix
Both are true and both are public, and their mode names differ by one letter.
That collision is the actual root of the "ten weighted parameters" that
reached press coverage, not a bad translation. Naming the mode every time a
dimension count appears is now doctrine; the fix is to state both, not to ban
the word "weighted", which would delete a true fact about a real mode.
Verified on a production build: zero A-F/A-G left on any served surface,
eight Block bullets on /docs.md, Block H present in all three locales.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
santifer
force-pushed
the
fix/rubric-canon-a-h
branch
from
September 10, 2026 20:48
727af1b to
ad677bc
Compare
|
Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 55 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (17)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Group-2 sweep. Canon fixed by search-ops on 2026-08-11 (18 days without objection), executing the plan measured on 2026-07-30.
The state before this PR
The site carried three different answers at once, depending on which file you opened:
A–F,A–G, and "seven-block". None of them matched the core.Verified against the core before writing (
modes/oferta.md, commit350ab739): eight## X)headings, and## H) Draft Application Answersgated on "only if score >= 4.5".What changed — 17 files
modes/{index,oferta,auto-pipeline}× EN/ES/FRA–F/A–GA–Hdocs/index× EN/ES/FRschema.tsBlock A-G evaluation, "seven-section"Block A-H, "eight-section"llms.txt,llms-full.txt,comparisons.jsonA–GA–HtranslationHashre-stamped on all eight touched translations (.i18n/hash.mjscontract).The disambiguation
Landed in the passages engines actually quote (
/methodologyandllms-full.txt):Both are true, both are public, and their mode names differ by one letter. That collision is the actual root of the "ten weighted parameters" that reached press coverage — not a bad translation. The fix is to state both. Banning the word "weighted" would delete a true fact about a real mode.
Naming the mode every time a dimension count appears is now doctrine.
Verified on a production build
A–F/A–G/A through Gleft on any served surface (/llms.txt,/llms-full.txt,/docs.md,/methodology).**Block X**bullets on/docs.md, A through H.Reversible
If Santiago vetoes the A-H canon, this is one revert. search-ops' instruction was explicit: execute, do not wait.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code