Require in_place_t with variadic unexpected ctors - #169
Open
jogerh wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This makes unexpected ctors more consistent with the C++ standard
jogerh
force-pushed
the
unexpected_in_place
branch
from
February 20, 2025 10:29
260cea3 to
c6064c9
Compare
jkammerland
approved these changes
May 22, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes unexpected constructors more consistent with the C++ standard. Intended to be merged on top of #167.