Add Rules to Better AEO and GEO category - #13169
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
isaaclombardssw
force-pushed
the
isaac/aeo-geo-category
branch
from
August 13, 2026 02:01
3dd5aef to
3283372
Compare
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
tiagov8
force-pushed
the
isaac/aeo-geo-category
branch
from
August 13, 2026 18:04
3283372 to
c4d528f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
✏️ AEO/GEO rules are multiplying and were scattered between Rules to Better Google Rankings and SEO and Rules to Better AI Development. They now warrant their own category.
✏️ New category
Rules to Better AEO and GEOunder Artificial Intelligence, indexing 10 rules.Moved out of their old category (these are purely about AI answer engines):
ai-optimization-geo-aeo(was in SEO)make-your-website-llm-friendly(was in AI Development)Dual-listed, because they are genuinely both classic SEO and AEO/GEO, and removing them from SEO would leave gaps there:
page-indexed-by-google- indexability is the eligibility gate for AI Overviewsstructured-data- reinforces entitiesauthor-e-e-a-t- trust signalscite-your-sources,back-claims-with-data,use-quotations- the three methods the GEO study measuredquery-deserves-freshness- recencyoptimise-content-for-topical-authority- depthLeft in SEO only: the technical fundamentals with no AI-specific angle (HTTPS, canonical, titles, meta, headings, responsive, alt text, Open Graph, sitemap, robots.txt).
Two follow-ups worth flagging:
do-you-phrase-the-heading-as-a-questionlooked like a good fit but isisArchived: true, so I left it alone. It may be worth unarchiving, since question-style headings matter more now than when it was retired in 2021.use-robots-txt-effectivelyis from 2015 and only covers redirect folders. Its AI-crawler gap is filled by Add rule: Do you let AI answer engines crawl your site? #13167, but the rule itself could use a refresh.Validators run locally and passing: check-mdx, category-sync, lint-urls.
✏️ n/a
🤖 Generated with Claude Code