chore(sync): bump mem0 to v2.0.15 - #112

Investigator 1 of 3 reviewed 34 PRs from aio-fleetbot[bot] across the JSONbored organization. The contributor is an automation bot that opens version-bump, release, and catalog-sync PRs. Only 4 PRs had full patch hydration; all 4 show mechanically benign changes (Dockerfile ARG version bumps, git submodule hash updates, changelog edits, XML template text syncs) with no executable code, no network calls, no credential access, and no dependency injection. The 6 preview-mode PRs and 24 metadata-only PRs in this shard could not be adversarially reviewed at the hunk level. The most frequently targeted repository in this shard (simplelogin-aio, 10 PRs) had zero patch review. Because >85% of PRs in this shard lack patch-level verification, a definitive safe/clean verdict cannot be supported, and concrete malicious findings are also absent. Verdict: inconclusive pending merged results from investigators 2 and 3. Investigator 3 of 3 reviewed 30 hydrated PRs (5 with full patches, 5 with truncated preview patches, and 20 metadata-only) out of 100 candidate PRs for aio-fleetbot[bot]. The account is a GitHub bot ([bot] suffix) operating exclusively within the JSONbored organization. All five fully-hydrated PRs show mechanical, benign automation: Docker/upstream version-pin bumps (e.g., nanoclaw-aio #63, mem0-aio #108/105, sure-aio #148) and changelog/template metadata updates (unraid-aio-template #51). No reviewed patch introduces new execution paths, network calls, obfuscated code, credential access, CI tampering, or permission changes. The bot consistently superseded older sync PRs with newer ones (10 prClosedNotMerged), which is consistent with upstream-monitoring automation. However, 70 PRs were omitted entirely (metadata only), five hydrated PRs had truncated preview patches, and the GitHub GraphQL profile/portfolio sources were unavailable. This coverage gap is too large to support a safe verdict, and the highest-risk code changes (Dockerfile modifications, CI pipelines, package scripts) in the omitted/metadata-only PRs were not directly reviewed at patch level. No concrete malicious evidence was found in any reviewed file, but the shard alone cannot provide a confident verdict.