nanoarrow: add IPC feature - #297287
Open
paleolimbot wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
from
August 5, 2026 17:58
0560940 to
6820e67
Compare
Contributor
|
Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 馃帀 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request. |
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
from
August 6, 2026 12:26
21a4721 to
2a08430
Compare
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
from
August 6, 2026 17:18
d71fe74 to
5a078c1
Compare
7 tasks
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
from
August 7, 2026 14:13
5a078c1 to
1af4f4b
Compare
SMillerDev
reviewed
Aug 7, 2026
| def install | ||
| system "cmake", "-S", ".", "-B", "build", *std_cmake_args | ||
| args = %w[-DNANOARROW_IPC=ON] | ||
| args << "-DNANOARROW_FLATCC_ROOT_DIR=#{Formula["flatcc"].opt_prefix}" |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| args << "-DNANOARROW_FLATCC_ROOT_DIR=#{Formula["flatcc"].opt_prefix}" | |
| args << "-DNANOARROW_FLATCC_ROOT_DIR=#{formula_opt_prefix("flatcc")}" |
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 7, 2026 15:30
58b32e1 to
ac5453a
Compare
paleolimbot
force-pushed
the
nanoarrow-0-9-0-ipc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 7, 2026 17:02
cb1ab0e to
7e4ef03
Compare
paleolimbot
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 7, 2026 17:43
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>?brew test <formula>?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>?Copilot via Claude Opus 4.5 helped me with the additions. I'm happy to answer questions about this (I'm a nanoarrow maintainer).