Add fabric.configFolder system property to set mod config path - #1082
Open
williambl wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Add fabric.configFolder system property to set mod config path#1082williambl wants to merge 1 commit into
fabric.configFolder system property to set mod config path#1082williambl wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Player3324
reviewed
Oct 8, 2025
As the logic of the new `getConfigDirectory0` function is very similar to the existing `getModsDirectory0`, I abstracted them both into `getConfiguredOrRelativeDirectory`, which I honestly didn't name very well, which retrieves a path from a system property or, as a fallback, as a predefined path relative to the game directory.
williambl
force-pushed
the
configurable-config-dir
branch
from
March 16, 2026 15:34
40f024c to
fdd61ba
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Super quick implementation of the first/main part (i.e. not 'Further options') of #1081.
I'm not sure if this is worth writing tests for?