Remove the "Parquet" tag from all results - #1231
Open
alexey-milovidov wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Infino was the only system carrying a "Parquet" tag, which made it the lone entry under that type filter. Storage format is expressed in the system name (e.g. "DuckDB (Parquet, single)"), not as a tag, so the label does not belong here. Removed from infino/template.json and all 9 historical result files, and regenerated data.generated.js. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
Results for Logs:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Systems should not have a "Parquet" label: https://benchmark.clickhouse.com/#system=-&type=+Pu&machine=-6t|ca2|6ax|g4e|6ale|3al&cluster_size=-&opensource=+s&hardware=+c&tuned=+n&metric=combined&queries=-
Infino turned out to be the only system in the whole repo carrying a
"Parquet"tag, which is why it sat alone under that type filter. Storage format is already expressed in the system name (DuckDB (Parquet, single),Trino (Parquet, partitioned), …) rather than as a tag, so the label doesn't belong.Changes
Dropped
"Parquet"fromtagsin:infino/template.json— so future runs don't reintroduce itinfino/results/20260729/c6a.4xlarge.jsoninfino/results/20260730/*.json(8 files, all machines)Tags are now
["Rust", "column-oriented", "search"]throughout.data.generated.jsregenerated with./generate-results.sh.Verification
./generate-results.shproduced a diff of exactly 8 lines — the 8 live Infino records — confirming the committed website data was otherwise in sync.python3 validate-results.py .→ exit 0 over 32174 result files (965 active). The 9 warnings are pre-existing and unrelated (clickhouse-cloud short result rows, an old infobright outlier).tagsarray anywhere in the repo contains"Parquet"any more.Deliberately left alone
DuckDB (Parquet, single)— that's system identity, not the label in question.infino/README.mddescribing the superfile storage format,infino/bench/src/main.rsRust imports, and the rootREADME.mdnote about the dataset being published in Parquet.There is also an
"Iceberg"tag in use by the datalake systems — arguably the same category of thing, but out of scope here. Happy to follow up if it should go too.🤖 Generated with Claude Code