gtl set and maps vs parallel_hashmap

[Nosenzor]

Hi Greg,
I've been a happy parallel_hashmap user for a year or so. And now i want to use gtl for the LRU memoizer. LRU memoizer is a super nice work, thank you ! I've tested on a mac and i could save a lot of computation time using the memoizer.
Then I've tested it on windows and MSVC is complaining about uint64_t umul128(uint64_t,uint64_t,uint64_t *) that is defined in both parallel_hashmap and gtl.
I was thinking to remove parallel_hashmap to use only gtl that also have hashmaps , i suspect they are the same map and set but i wanted a confirmation before doing that change.

[greg7mdp]

Thanks for the kind words @Nosenzor . I'm glad you like the LRU memoizer.
Yes, they are the same maps. If you are using c++20 or above I do recommend using gtl instead of parallel-hashmap. Mosttly you just change phmap:: to gtl::.