Skip to content

Fix the comments in the epic geometry implementation to reflect EcalBarreScFi orientation #959

Description

@wdconinc

Interesting, I wonder what changed and how long the algorithm has been wrong. From your figures I agree that XY is the correct plane to use here. I retract my previous objection. We should also fix the comments in the geometry implementation so we avoid future confusion.

Originally posted by @sly2j in eic/EICrecon#2094 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions