You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It shoud not be instantaneous. Perhaps an average of the last hr or day. I'm not sure the best value. But a time average it would be much more meaningful and comparable. Say Im trying to underclock, I want to know when the error is starting to rise. Now, all i see is 0, a second later 0.17%. If I drop the voltage, I still see 0, a second later 0.17%. Where as if it was a time average, I could leave each underclock setting for an hour and compare the averaged error rate of both settings.
I realise the graph can show error rate, but it is not as helpful as a simple averaged value over time.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
It shoud not be instantaneous. Perhaps an average of the last hr or day. I'm not sure the best value. But a time average it would be much more meaningful and comparable. Say Im trying to underclock, I want to know when the error is starting to rise. Now, all i see is 0, a second later 0.17%. If I drop the voltage, I still see 0, a second later 0.17%. Where as if it was a time average, I could leave each underclock setting for an hour and compare the averaged error rate of both settings.
I realise the graph can show error rate, but it is not as helpful as a simple averaged value over time.
All reactions