Issues

• Describe 30/60/90 day activities for a specification committee

  operations
  EclipseFdn/EFSP#69 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on May 26, 2022
  3

  

• Notify specification committee immediately after posting a project specification project proposal for community review

  operations
  EclipseFdn/EFSP#68 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Nov 16, 2021
  5

  

• The specification committee should be where an alternative patent license type is proposed

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#67 · Filter by author starksm64 opened on Sep 28, 2021
  11

• "Candidate Final Specificiation" does not read well

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#66 · Filter by author Emily-Jiang opened on Sep 25, 2021

• Project artifacts do not have to be developed by the project team

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#64 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Sep 17, 2021
  

• The project team owns the proposal document

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#61 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Aug 23, 2021
  2

• Process for retiring a Specification?

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#60 · Filter by author kwsutter opened on Aug 10, 2021
  4

• Clarify if plan is needed for Creation Review

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#58 · Filter by author edbratt opened on Jul 29, 2021
  6

• Add a "Front Matter Requirements" section to the operations guide

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#54 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jun 17, 2021

• Requiring Profiles to include the applicable TCKs

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#53 · Filter by author paulbuck opened on Jun 11, 2021
  1

• Clarify what is a "testing party’s website" in the TCK License

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#52 · Filter by author bjhargrave opened on Jun 9, 2021
  4

• Clarify the nature of a "Specification"

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#46 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on May 12, 2021
  3

• Reviews and ballots are only required for releases of specifications

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#44 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on May 10, 2021

• The notion of "Platform" adds no value

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#43 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on May 3, 2021
  9

• Specification track without notion of TCK

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#41 · Filter by author DBees opened on Apr 22, 2021
  5

• "Super-majority of the Strategic Members of the Working Group" doesn't work in the general case

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#39 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Apr 13, 2021
  3

  

• Clarify that designation of a profile requires a ballot of the specification committee

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#36 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Apr 6, 2021
  1

• Specifications are added to an existing specification project via plan review

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#30 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jan 20, 2021

• Add selection of the specification Patent License to the operations guide

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#28 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jan 18, 2021

• Clarify the conditions by which a Participant Representative may be appointed

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#23 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Oct 5, 2020
  6

• Patent rights are granted via the IP Policy

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#21 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jun 12, 2020

• The wording for the approval process for adding new open source licenses is ambiguous

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#20 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jun 3, 2020

• Use a variable to indicate "DRAFT" state

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#18 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jun 14, 2019

• Must the TCK be developed by an Eclipse project?

  EclipseFdn/EFSP#16 · Filter by author waynebeaton opened on Jun 14, 2019
  1